Reviewer Guidelines
Standards for rigorous and constructive peer review in plant science.
The Foundation of Scientific Quality
Peer review is the cornerstone of credible research. Your expert evaluation ensures published work meets the highest standards of scientific validity and advances plant biology knowledge.
Timeliness
Complete reviews within 14 days of acceptance. If unable to meet deadlines, notify the editor promptly to allow reviewer reassignment.
Objectivity
Evaluate manuscripts based solely on scientific merit. Provide evidence-based critique without personal bias or competitive concerns.
Confidentiality
Treat manuscripts as confidential. Never share content, discuss findings, or use ideas without author permission.
Constructiveness
Offer actionable suggestions for improvement. Even for rejections, provide feedback helping authors strengthen future submissions.
- Summary: Brief overview of the study and its contribution to plant biology
- Major Comments: Methodological concerns, missing controls, fundamental flaws
- Minor Comments: Clarity issues, nomenclature errors, figure improvements
- Recommendation: Accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject
Questions About Reviewing?
Contact the editorial office for guidance.
