Editorial Policies
Integrity, quality, and fairness in plant science publishing.
Upholding Scientific Standards
JAPB adheres to guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and ensures transparency in all editorial processes. Our policies protect the integrity of the plant science literature.
Double-Blind Process
Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout review, ensuring manuscripts are judged solely on scientific merit without institutional bias.
Expert Evaluation
Minimum two independent expert reviews required. Editors select reviewers with relevant plant biology expertise and no conflicts of interest.
Constructive Feedback
Reviewers provide detailed, actionable comments. We expect professional, evidence-based critique aimed at improving manuscript quality.
Appeals Process
Authors may appeal editorial decisions in writing with specific rebuttals to reviewer concerns and new supporting evidence.
Plagiarism Prevention
- iThenticate screening all submissions
- Self-plagiarism monitoring
- Duplicate publication detection
- Proper citation requirements
Conflicts of Interest
- Author financial disclosures
- Reviewer conflict declaration
- Editor recusal when needed
- Published COI statements
Post-Publication
- Errata for minor errors
- Expressions of Concern
- Retraction for serious issues
- COPE-compliant procedures
Reporting Concerns: Anyone suspecting research misconduct, data fabrication, or publication ethics violations may report confidentially to [email protected]. All reports are investigated according to COPE guidelines.
Questions About Policies?
Contact our editorial office for clarification.
