Reviewer Register
Join the JPAN reviewer community to support high-quality pancreatic research and evidence-based publication.
Eligibility
Profile
Commitment
Ethics
Recognition
Support
Who Should Apply
EligibilityClinical And Research Experience
Reviewers should have expertise in pancreatology, endocrine disease, pancreatic oncology, or surgical outcomes.
Method Expertise
Experience with imaging, biomarker assays, clinical trials, or experimental models is valued.
Commitment
Ability to provide timely, objective reviews that improve manuscript quality.
Profile Tips
List keywords, methods expertise, and recent publications to improve matching accuracy.
Recognition
Active reviewers may receive certificates and invitations to contribute to special issues.
High-quality reviews directly improve manuscript clarity and strengthen the evidence base.
Register As A Reviewer
Email [email protected] with your research keywords and recent publications.
Join The Reviewer Pool
Reviewer RegisterExpertise Match
Share keywords aligned with pancreatic subspecialties and methods expertise.
Availability
Provide expected review capacity to support timely editorial decisions.
Ethics
Declare any conflicts of interest to preserve review integrity.
Additional Notes
GuidanceSubmission Support
Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.
Workflow
Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.
Visibility
Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.
Service Support
CommunityGuidance
Editors and reviewers receive templates and policy guidance to support consistent decisions.
Recognition
Service contributions may be acknowledged through certificates and professional visibility.
Community
Participation strengthens the pancreatic research ecosystem and improves quality.
Reviewer Application Strength
Readiness ProfileExpertise Positioning
Present clear topic domains, analytic methods, and manuscript types you can evaluate confidently. Accurate positioning improves invitation fit and helps editors select reviewers who can deliver high value feedback on pancreatic research submissions.
Reliability Expectations
Review quality includes both scientific depth and dependable timelines. Applicants who communicate realistic availability and maintain schedule discipline are more likely to become trusted long term contributors.
Ethical Preparedness
Be ready to disclose conflicts promptly and decline invitations when expertise or objectivity is limited. Ethical discipline is a core reviewer selection criterion and a foundational component of editorial trust.
Clearly defined method strengths and timely availability statements improve invitation quality and increase the likelihood of regular reviewer engagement.
Clear availability commitments improve assignment quality and schedule predictability.
Timely responses strengthen assignment planning.
