Editor Register
Join the JPAN editorial board to support rigorous pancreatic research and high-quality publication standards.
Eligibility
Profile
Commitment
Quality
Ethics
Support
Who Should Apply
EligibilityClinical Expertise
Researchers and clinicians with expertise in pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis, surgery, or endocrine disease.
Research Track
Strong publication record and peer review experience in pancreatic science.
Commitment
Ability to provide timely decisions and constructive guidance.
Profile Tips
Include ORCID, recent publications, and specific methods expertise to support accurate reviewer matching.
Onboarding
New editors receive training resources and support from the editorial office for consistent decisions.
Serving as editor demonstrates leadership and commitment to advancing pancreatic research.
Register As An Editor
Email [email protected] with your CV and research keywords. for consideration.
Application Tips
Editor RegisterExpertise
Provide keywords that reflect your pancreatic research or clinical specialization.
Availability
Indicate expected time availability to support timely reviews and decisions.
Experience
List editorial or peer review experience to help match you with appropriate submissions.
Additional Notes
GuidanceSubmission Support
Contact [email protected] with brief questions to avoid delays during submission.
Workflow
Clear documentation and timely responses help keep editorial timelines on track.
Visibility
Well structured manuscripts improve search visibility and long term impact.
Service Support
CommunityGuidance
Editors and reviewers receive templates and policy guidance to support consistent decisions.
Recognition
Service contributions may be acknowledged through certificates and professional visibility.
Community
Participation strengthens the pancreatic research ecosystem and improves quality.
How To Strengthen Your Application
Selection ReadinessShow Domain Depth
Highlight specific pancreatic subfields, methodological strengths, and publication contributions. Focused expertise statements make assignment matching easier and demonstrate readiness for high quality editorial handling.
Demonstrate Review Reliability
Include evidence of prior peer review service, average turnaround behavior, and decision quality contributions where available. Reliability data is highly persuasive in editor onboarding decisions.
Communicate Availability Clearly
Set realistic assignment capacity and provide preferred communication channels. Clear availability planning helps the editorial office maintain stable handling timelines and reduces reassignment risk.
Profiles with specific expertise keywords, realistic availability, and evidence of responsible review conduct are prioritized because they support efficient assignment quality and predictable editorial timelines.
Profiles with clear scope statements and reliable timelines are prioritized for onboarding.
Clear role expectations improve early performance.
