Reviewer Resources
Tools and guidance for JEN peer reviewers.
Review Support Center
Access resources to deliver high-quality, constructive peer reviews advancing enzyme publication standards.
Reviewer Portal
ManuscriptZone access for managing invitations, downloading manuscripts, and submitting reviews.
Review Templates
Structured frameworks for organizing feedback on enzyme methodology and results.
Guidelines Access
Quick links to JEN review standards and ethical expectations.
- Read manuscript thoroughly, noting strengths and concerns
- Evaluate methodology, results interpretation, and significance
- Provide specific, actionable suggestions for improvement
- Complete structured review form with recommendation
Support: Contact [email protected] for assistance with review submissions or manuscript questions.
High-quality reviews provide specific feedback addressing methodological rigor and presentation clarity. Balance critique with constructive suggestions.
If unable to review due to conflicts or workload, decline promptly for reviewer reassignment. Suggesting alternatives is helpful.
Editors may provide feedback on review quality supporting professional development and enhancing future contributions.
Submit reviews within agreed deadlines, typically 2-3 weeks. If delays are unavoidable, notify editorial office promptly. Consistent timely reviews maintain author trust and publication efficiency.
Access orientation materials covering review best practices, ethical expectations, and structured feedback approaches. Resources support consistent quality across enzyme manuscript evaluations.
Contribute to the enzyme research peer review community supporting rigorous scientific publishing standards. Your expertise ensures quality research reaches the enzymology literature.
Access guidelines for handling suspected misconduct, conflicts of interest, and other ethical concerns during manuscript review. Report concerns to editors for appropriate investigation.
