Reviewing for JPA provides professional recognition and keeps you informed about emerging precision agriculture research. Reviewers contribute to scientific quality and help shape the field.

• Build expertise in evaluating field methods
• Improve understanding of precision agriculture reporting
• Strengthen critical appraisal skills
• Network with editors and peer reviewers
• Reviewers should assess field design, data integrity, and reporting clarity.
• Check that remote sensing or sensor data are validated against ground truth.
• Confirm that models include appropriate baselines and performance metrics.
• Evaluate reproducibility of data processing workflows and code sharing.
• Assess relevance of findings to farm decision making and sustainability.
• Check that maps include scale bars, north arrows, and legends.
• Confirm agronomic units are consistent across tables and figures.
• Review whether baseline comparisons are appropriate and stated.

Reviewers may request acknowledgment letters for institutional or professional documentation.

JPA is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in precision agriculture and digital farming. We emphasize reproducible field trials, clear reporting of agronomic outcomes, and ethical compliance across all article types.

The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].

We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in agricultural data science, field validation, and technology transfer.