International Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases - Editorial Policies
Comprehensive editorial standards ensuring rigorous, ethical, and transparent peer review for STI research.
Peer Review Process
All research manuscripts undergo rigorous peer review by qualified experts in relevant STI specialties before acceptance for publication. IJSTD employs single-blind peer review where reviewers remain anonymous to authors while author identities are known to reviewers. This approach balances candid evaluation with accountability while protecting reviewers from potential retribution for negative assessments.
Manuscripts typically receive evaluation from two or more independent reviewers selected based on relevant expertise, absence of conflicts of interest, and availability for timely review. Editors synthesize reviewer recommendations with their own assessment to make informed acceptance, revision, or rejection decisions. Authors receive detailed feedback explaining decisions and providing constructive guidance for manuscript improvement.
Expert Reviewer Selection
Reviewers are selected based on demonstrated expertise in relevant subject areas, methodological approaches, and population groups addressed by each submission. Editors verify absence of conflicts before invitation and ensure diverse perspectives inform evaluation decisions.
Structured Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers assess scientific validity, methodological rigor, data presentation clarity, appropriate statistical analysis, ethical compliance, results interpretation, and overall contribution to STI knowledge using structured evaluation forms guiding comprehensive assessment.
Constructive Feedback
Reviewers provide specific, actionable suggestions helping authors strengthen manuscripts regardless of final publication decisions. Feedback should be professional, respectful, and focused on improving scientific quality rather than stylistic preferences.
Timely Processing
IJSTD strives to complete initial review within six to eight weeks from submission. Authors can track manuscript status online and receive regular updates on review progress. Expedited review may be available for time-sensitive public health submissions.
Research Ethics Requirements
All research involving human subjects must receive appropriate ethics committee or institutional review board approval before participant enrollment and manuscript submission. Authors must confirm ethics compliance and provide approval reference numbers during submission. Research involving animals must follow established guidelines including ARRIVE recommendations and receive animal care committee approval.
Clinical trials must be prospectively registered in recognized public registries such as ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN, or WHO-approved national registries before enrollment of the first participant. Registration details should be reported in manuscripts. Observational studies should follow STROBE, CONSORT, or other applicable reporting guidelines to ensure transparent methodology description.
Author Responsibilities and Research Integrity
Authors must confirm that submitted manuscripts represent original work not previously published or currently under consideration elsewhere. All authors listed must have made substantial contributions to conception, design, data analysis, or manuscript preparation meeting ICMJE authorship criteria. Ghost authorship and gift authorship are not permitted and will result in manuscript rejection or post-publication correction.
Authors must disclose all potential conflicts of interest including financial relationships, employment, consulting arrangements, stock ownership, and personal relationships that could influence research conduct or interpretation. Funding sources must be acknowledged with specific grant numbers and funder involvement in study design or manuscript preparation disclosed.
Plagiarism Detection: All submitted manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection software. Manuscripts with unacceptable text similarity are rejected or require revision before further consideration. Self-plagiarism of substantial portions of prior publications is not acceptable.
Data Fabrication and Falsification: Fabricated or falsified data represent serious research misconduct. Suspected misconduct is investigated following COPE guidelines and may result in rejection, retraction, notification of institutional authorities, and publication bans.
Editorial Independence and Conflicts
Editorial decisions are based solely on manuscript scientific merit, methodological quality, and contribution to STI knowledge. Commercial considerations, author reputation, institutional prestige, and funding sources do not influence acceptance decisions. Editors with potential conflicts of interest recuse themselves from handling affected manuscripts.
IJSTD maintains clear separation between editorial decision-making and business operations. Advertising and sponsorship arrangements never influence content decisions. Editorial board members participating in peer review follow the same guidelines as external reviewers with additional disclosure requirements.
Submit Your STI Research
Experience our transparent, rigorous peer review process for your sexually transmitted infection research.